# Gusto vs ADP: global payroll compared

> Machine-readable page from Payroll Overview (https://payrolloverview.com/), the independent index of global payroll providers.
> Canonical page: https://payrolloverview.com/compare/gusto-vs-adp/
> Methodology: every figure carries a source and a date in our database; ratings are averages of third-party platforms (https://payrolloverview.com/methodology/).
> Disclosure: Payroll Overview is free to use. We may earn a referral fee from some providers; this never affects inclusion or order (https://payrolloverview.com/disclosure/).

## Side by side

| Field | Gusto | ADP |
|---|---|---|
| Payroll price | Quote only | from $79/employee/month |
| Payroll countries | 106 | 3 |
| Pay cycles | bi-weekly, semi-monthly | bi-weekly, semi-monthly |
| Payout currencies | — | 3 |
| Rating | 3.3/5 (15,637 reviews) | 3.2/5 (8,030 reviews) |
| Founded | 2011 | 1949 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, US | Roseland, US |
| Services | eor, payroll, contractor_management | eor, payroll |
| Full review | https://payrolloverview.com/providers/gusto/ | https://payrolloverview.com/providers/adp/ |

## Gusto pros and cons

- Pro: They cover 103 countries, which is above the typical 50-100 range. This gives you solid global reach without paying for enterprise-level coverage you might not need.
- Pro: With 15 years in business, they've had time to work out the bugs. That maturity shows in their 4.5-star rating across 2,200+ reviews.
- Pro: The crypto payment option is genuinely unique. If you're hiring remote talent who prefer digital currency, this sets them apart from competitors.
- Pro: 24/7 support and dedicated account management means you're not stuck waiting during payroll emergencies, which matters when you're dealing with multiple time zones.
- Pro: Their employee portal and mobile app make it easy for your team to access pay stubs and tax documents without bugging HR constantly.
- Pro: Multi-currency support with payment methods like Wise and PayPal alongside traditional banking gives you flexibility in how money moves.
- Con: No public pricing means you can't quickly compare costs. You'll need to sit through a sales call to get numbers, which slows down evaluation.
- Con: Based on the pricing tier context, they likely fall in the mid to upper range compared to competitors like Deel and Remote who advertise $29-49 per employee.
- Con: Only offers bi-weekly and semi-monthly pay frequencies. If your team needs weekly or monthly payroll, you'll have to adjust your processes.
- Con: Some reviews mention the platform can feel complex when you're first setting it up, especially if you're migrating from a simpler US-only system.
- Con: While 103 countries is solid, it's not as extensive as some enterprise providers if you need truly global coverage in more obscure markets.

## ADP pros and cons

- Pro: The 77 years in business means they've navigated every tax law change and compliance update imaginable, which translates to fewer surprises
- Pro: Crypto payment support is genuinely rare in this space, useful if you're hiring remote talent who prefer cryptocurrency compensation
- Pro: 24/7 support with dedicated account management means you're not stuck waiting until Monday morning when payroll issues hit on a weekend
- Pro: On-demand pay gives employees flexibility to access wages early, which can be a real differentiator for talent retention
- Pro: The combination of payroll and EOR services means one vendor, one contract, one point of contact for international employment
- Pro: Compliance dashboard and automated tax filing take the guesswork out of multi-jurisdiction payroll requirements
- Con: At $79 per employee, they're 2-3x more expensive than competitors like Deel, Remote, or Oyster who offer similar global payroll features
- Con: Only 3 countries covered is extremely limited compared to the industry standard of 50-100 countries, severely restricting global expansion options
- Con: 474 total reviews is a relatively small sample size, making it harder to assess consistent performance across different use cases
- Con: Limited to bi-weekly and semi-monthly pay frequencies, which may not work for companies that need weekly or monthly payroll cycles
- Con: The regional focus on North America and Americas means they're not a viable option if you're hiring in Europe, Asia, or other regions