# Papaya Global vs Globalization Partners: global payroll compared

> Machine-readable page from Payroll Overview (https://payrolloverview.com/), the independent index of global payroll providers.
> Canonical page: https://payrolloverview.com/compare/papaya-global-vs-globalization-partners/
> Methodology: every figure carries a source and a date in our database; ratings are averages of third-party platforms (https://payrolloverview.com/methodology/).
> Disclosure: Payroll Overview is free to use. We may earn a referral fee from some providers; this never affects inclusion or order (https://payrolloverview.com/disclosure/).

## Side by side

| Field | Papaya Global | Globalization Partners |
|---|---|---|
| Payroll price | Quote only | Quote only |
| Payroll countries | 163 | 188 |
| Pay cycles | bi-weekly, semi-monthly | bi-weekly, semi-monthly |
| Payout currencies | — | — |
| Rating | 4.4/5 (156 reviews) | 4.4/5 (1,283 reviews) |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York, US | Boston, US |
| Services | eor, payroll, contractor_management | eor, payroll, contractor_management |
| Full review | https://payrolloverview.com/providers/papaya-global/ | https://payrolloverview.com/providers/globalization-partners/ |

## Papaya Global pros and cons

- Pro: The fintech infrastructure they built means they have direct control over payment processing, which can mean faster payments and fewer intermediary issues
- Pro: Crypto payment support sets them apart if you're hiring in markets where traditional banking is difficult or expensive
- Pro: 4.5-star average across all review platforms shows consistently positive user experiences, even if the total review count is lower than some competitors
- Pro: 24/7 support is genuinely helpful when you've got employees across Asia, Europe, and the Americas all needing payroll assistance
- Pro: Having payroll, EOR, and contractor management in one system saves you from juggling multiple platforms and vendor relationships
- Pro: They've been around since 2016, giving them nearly a decade to build out their compliance frameworks and country expertise
- Con: Coverage of 15 countries is importantly below the 50-100 country range most global payroll providers offer, limiting options for expansion
- Con: Contact-based pricing means you can't quickly compare costs against competitors like Deel ($29-49) or Remote ($29) without going through a sales process
- Con: 117 total reviews is lower than major competitors, making it harder to find user feedback about specific use cases or pain points
- Con: The platform appears focused on specific regions rather than truly global coverage, which could be limiting if you're planning expansion into uncovered markets
- Con: Payment frequencies are limited to bi-weekly and semi-monthly, so companies needing weekly or monthly pay cycles may face constraints

## Globalization Partners pros and cons

- Pro: They cover 189 countries, which genuinely stands out. Most global providers handle 50-100 countries, so this gives you far more flexibility for expansion.
- Pro: 14 years in business means they've built solid compliance infrastructure and relationships with local authorities that take time to develop.
- Pro: The 4.6-star rating across both G2 and Capterra shows consistent quality, and the scores hold up across hundreds of reviews.
- Pro: 24/7 support with dedicated account managers helps when you're dealing with payroll issues in different time zones and can't wait until morning.
- Pro: Crypto payment options give you flexibility for contractors or employees who prefer that method, which most traditional providers don't offer.
- Pro: Combines EOR and payroll in one platform, so you avoid the headache of coordinating between separate vendors for hiring and payments.
- Con: No public pricing means you'll need to go through sales calls to get a quote, which takes time and typically signals enterprise-level costs.
- Con: With only 376 total reviews, there's less feedback available compared to providers with thousands of reviews to help gauge consistent performance.
- Con: Limited to bi-weekly and semi-monthly pay schedules, so if your team needs weekly or monthly payment options, you're out of luck.
- Con: The enterprise focus and custom pricing likely put them out of range for small businesses or startups with tight budgets.
- Con: No mention of contractor payment capabilities in their listed services, which could be a gap if you have a mixed workforce