# Rippling vs Globalization Partners: global payroll compared

> Machine-readable page from Payroll Overview (https://payrolloverview.com/), the independent index of global payroll providers.
> Canonical page: https://payrolloverview.com/compare/rippling-vs-globalization-partners/
> Methodology: every figure carries a source and a date in our database; ratings are averages of third-party platforms (https://payrolloverview.com/methodology/).
> Disclosure: Payroll Overview is free to use. We may earn a referral fee from some providers; this never affects inclusion or order (https://payrolloverview.com/disclosure/).

## Side by side

| Field | Rippling | Globalization Partners |
|---|---|---|
| Payroll price | Quote only | Quote only |
| Payroll countries | 83 | 188 |
| Pay cycles | bi-weekly | bi-weekly, semi-monthly |
| Payout currencies | 27 | — |
| Rating | 4.7/5 (20,856 reviews) | 4.4/5 (1,280 reviews) |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, US | Boston, US |
| Services | eor, payroll, contractor_management | eor, payroll |
| Full review | https://payrolloverview.com/providers/rippling/ | https://payrolloverview.com/providers/globalization-partners/ |

## Rippling pros and cons

- Pro: The 4.8-star average across 17,648 reviews is genuinely impressive. That's a huge sample size with consistently high ratings, which tells you the product delivers at scale
- Pro: They've been around since 2016 with over 10,000 employees, so you're working with a mature company that's not going anywhere
- Pro: The all-in-one approach actually works here. You can manage payroll, benefits, devices, and software access from one dashboard instead of logging into five different tools
- Pro: 53-country coverage hits the sweet spot for most internationally growing companies without overwhelming you with options you won't use
- Pro: Payment flexibility is excellent, from standard bank transfers to SEPA, SWIFT, Wise, PayPal, and even crypto options
- Pro: 24/7 support with dedicated reps means you're not stuck waiting when payroll issues pop up outside business hours
- Con: At $35 per employee, they're priced at the higher end of mid-range options. Deel and Remote both start at $29, Oyster ranges $29-59, so you're paying a premium
- Con: The platform does a lot, which means there's a steeper learning curve. Reviews mention it can feel overwhelming initially compared to simpler payroll-only tools
- Con: Only offers bi-weekly pay frequency, which could be limiting if your team needs weekly or monthly payment schedules
- Con: 53 countries is solid but not massive. If you're hiring heavily in Asia, Africa, or Latin America, you'll want to verify they cover your specific markets
- Con: Some reviews mention the setup process takes longer than expected, particularly when configuring the IT management components alongside payroll

## Globalization Partners pros and cons

- Pro: They cover 189 countries, which genuinely stands out. Most global providers handle 50-100 countries, so this gives you far more flexibility for expansion.
- Pro: 14 years in business means they've built solid compliance infrastructure and relationships with local authorities that take time to develop.
- Pro: The 4.6-star rating across both G2 and Capterra shows consistent quality, and the scores hold up across hundreds of reviews.
- Pro: 24/7 support with dedicated account managers helps when you're dealing with payroll issues in different time zones and can't wait until morning.
- Pro: Crypto payment options give you flexibility for contractors or employees who prefer that method, which most traditional providers don't offer.
- Pro: Combines EOR and payroll in one platform, so you avoid the headache of coordinating between separate vendors for hiring and payments.
- Con: No public pricing means you'll need to go through sales calls to get a quote, which takes time and typically signals enterprise-level costs.
- Con: With only 376 total reviews, there's less feedback available compared to providers with thousands of reviews to help gauge consistent performance.
- Con: Limited to bi-weekly and semi-monthly pay schedules, so if your team needs weekly or monthly payment options, you're out of luck.
- Con: The enterprise focus and custom pricing likely put them out of range for small businesses or startups with tight budgets.
- Con: No mention of contractor payment capabilities in their listed services, which could be a gap if you have a mixed workforce