Comparison guide
Rippling vs Remote
A detailed comparison of pricing, features, country coverage, and more to help you choose the right global payroll provider.
You've narrowed it down to Rippling and Remote — two solid choices for managing global hiring. Now you're stuck trying to figure out which one actually fits your situation. Rippling has been building its HR and workforce platform since 2016, and it shows. It covers payroll, IT, and HR in one system, which appeals to companies that want everything in one place. Remote launched in 2019 with a clear focus on global employment, and it's built out an impressive presence across 186+ countries — one of the widest reaches in the industry. This comparison breaks down how the two stack up on pricing, country coverage, services, and the types of teams each one tends to work for. By the end, you should have a clear sense of which one makes more sense for where your company is headed.
Quick verdict
Not sure which to pick? Here's a quick breakdown of when each provider shines.
Rippling is best for:
- Companies needing both payroll and IT management, particularly those issuing company devices and software licenses to remote teams
- Businesses with 50+ employees across multiple countries in Europe who want to consolidate vendors
- Organizations requiring flexible payment options including crypto for contractor payments or international teams
- Not ideal for small US-only businesses under 20 employees who don't need the full platform, Gusto or similar domestic providers would be more cost-effective
Remote is best for:
- Companies hiring across 10+ countries who need both payroll and employer of record capabilities under one roof
- Remote-first businesses with distributed teams across multiple continents, particularly those expanding into less common markets
- Organizations that pay contractors and full-time employees internationally and want to manage both through a single platform
- Not ideal for US-only companies, domestic providers like Gusto offer the same features at $6-12 per employee versus Remote's $29
How do Rippling and Remote compare at a glance?
How does Rippling compare to Remote on pricing?
Remote starts 17% lower at $29/mo vs $35/mo for Rippling. However, total costs depend on your team size and specific needs.
💡 Tip: Prices vary based on country, employee volume, and contract terms. Request quotes from both providers to get accurate pricing for your team.
Still comparing? Get personalized pricing
Request a quote from both providers to compare costs for your specific needs.
What countries do Rippling and Remote support?
Remote supports 133 more countries than Rippling.
Countries supported by both (44)
Only Rippling (9)
Only Remote (142)
How do Rippling and Remote compare on features?
Both providers offer a similar feature set.
What are the pros and cons of Rippling vs Remote?
Both providers have similar trade-offs. Rippling has 6 pros and 5 cons, while Remote has 6 pros and 5 cons.
Pros
- The 4.8-star average across 17,648 reviews is genuinely impressive. That's a huge sample size with consistently high ratings, which tells you the product delivers at scale
- They've been around since 2016 with over 10,000 employees, so you're working with a mature company that's not going anywhere
- The all-in-one approach actually works here. You can manage payroll, benefits, devices, and software access from one dashboard instead of logging into five different tools
- 53-country coverage hits the sweet spot for most internationally growing companies without overwhelming you with options you won't use
- Payment flexibility is excellent, from standard bank transfers to SEPA, SWIFT, Wise, PayPal, and even crypto options
- 24/7 support with dedicated reps means you're not stuck waiting when payroll issues pop up outside business hours
Cons
- At $35 per employee, they're priced at the higher end of mid-range options. Deel and Remote both start at $29, Oyster ranges $29-59, so you're paying a premium
- The platform does a lot, which means there's a steeper learning curve. Reviews mention it can feel overwhelming initially compared to simpler payroll-only tools
- Only offers bi-weekly pay frequency, which could be limiting if your team needs weekly or monthly payment schedules
- 53 countries is solid but not massive. If you're hiring heavily in Asia, Africa, or Latin America, you'll want to verify they cover your specific markets
- Some reviews mention the setup process takes longer than expected, particularly when configuring the IT management components alongside payroll
Pros
- The 186-country coverage is genuinely impressive. Most competitors cap out around 100, so if you're hiring in less common markets, Remote likely has you covered.
- Over 7,000 reviews averaging 4.6 stars tells you they've processed payroll for thousands of companies. That's the kind of volume that surfaces and fixes edge cases.
- They handle everything from payroll to visa support to equipment shipping. One vendor means one invoice and one support contact instead of coordinating multiple services.
- Crypto payment option is rare in this space. If you're paying digital nomads or employees in countries with currency volatility, having that flexibility matters.
- 24/7 support with dedicated account reps. When you're running payroll across time zones, having someone available outside business hours is important.
- Their API access and HRIS integrations mean you can connect Remote to your existing HR tools rather than forcing everyone onto a new system.
Cons
- At $29 per employee, they're 4-5x more expensive than domestic providers like Gusto. If your team is US-based, you're paying for global capabilities you don't need.
- Some reviews mention slower response times during payroll deadlines when support volume spikes. If you hit an issue on payday, you might wait longer than you'd like.
- The platform tries to do everything from payroll to equipment procurement. Some users report the interface feels cluttered compared to tools that focus solely on payroll.
- Setup for new countries can take 2-3 weeks according to user feedback. If you need to hire and pay someone quickly, that timeline might not work.
- While they cover 186 countries, payment method availability varies by region. Some locations are limited to bank transfers without faster options like Wise or PayPal.
Both are solid choices for global payroll
Get started with a free demo to see which platform fits your team better. Most companies can be onboarded within days.
Frequently asked questions about Rippling vs Remote
Rippling is cheaper for EOR at $499/month per employee vs. Remote's $599/month — a $100/month difference. For a team of 5, that's $6,000/year in savings with Rippling. Both offer contractor management at lower price points, so the gap matters most if you're hiring full-time international employees.
Remote covers more ground — 186+ countries vs. Rippling's 53+. If you're hiring in established markets like Germany, Canada, or Australia, both work fine. But for less common locations in Southeast Asia, Africa, or Latin America, Remote is the stronger bet.
Rippling edges ahead for startups that want HR, IT, and payroll in one platform — less tool-switching as you scale. Remote is a strong pick if you're hiring across many countries from day one. Rippling's lower EOR pricing also helps when every dollar counts early on.
Yes, switching is possible but requires planning. You'll need to offboard employees from Rippling's EOR and re-onboard them through Remote, which involves new employment contracts. Budget 4-8 weeks for a smooth transition and check for any notice periods in your Rippling contract before starting.
Rippling scores slightly higher on G2 — 4.8/5 vs. Remote's 4.6/5 — and users frequently cite responsive support as a reason. Remote is well-reviewed too, particularly for compliance guidance in complex markets. Neither has a glaring support problem; Rippling just has a slight edge in user satisfaction scores.
Rippling is a broader workforce platform — it bundles HR, IT, and payroll together, making it powerful if you want one system for everything. Remote is more focused on global employment and shines in country coverage at 186+ nations. Rippling costs less; Remote reaches further.
Compare with other providers
Ready to get started?
Both Rippling and Remote offer free demos. Try them out to see which fits your team better.