Rippling vs Remote for global payroll
A detailed comparison of pricing, features, country coverage, and more to help you choose the right global payroll provider.
Choosing between Rippling and Remote? You're looking at two of the most popular global payroll providers, each with distinct strengths.
Remote has transparent pricing starting at $29/month, while Rippling offers custom quotes. Remote covers 186+ countries compared to Rippling's 83+ countries.
This comparison breaks down pricing, features, country coverage, and the trade-offs of each platform to help you make the right choice for your team.
Which one should you pick?
Not sure which to pick? Here's when each provider shines.
- ·Companies needing both payroll and IT management, particularly those issuing company devices and software licenses to remote teams
- ·Businesses with 50+ employees across multiple countries in Europe who want to consolidate vendors
- ·Organizations requiring flexible payment options including crypto for contractor payments or international teams
- ·Not ideal for small US-only businesses under 20 employees who don't need the full platform, Gusto or similar domestic providers would be more cost-effective
- ·Companies hiring across 10+ countries who need both payroll and employer of record capabilities under one roof
- ·Remote-first businesses with distributed teams across multiple continents, particularly those expanding into less common markets
- ·Organizations that pay contractors and full-time employees internationally and want to manage both through a single platform
- ·Not ideal for US-only companies, domestic providers like Gusto offer the same features at $6-12 per employee versus Remote's $29
You are in one or two countries only
At that footprint a local payroll bureau is usually cheaper and closer to the rules. Platforms start paying off around the third country.
How do Rippling and Remote compare at a glance?
Same fields, same order, same wording. Green marks the stronger figure where one is objectively better.
| Payroll comparison | Rippling | Remote |
|---|---|---|
| Payroll price | Quote only | $29/emp/mo |
| Payroll countries | 83 | 186 |
| Pay cycles | bi-weekly | weekly, bi-weekly, semi-monthly, monthly |
| Payout currencies | 27 | 52 |
| GL & HRIS integrations | QuickBooks Online, Xero, NetSuite | QuickBooks Online, Xero, NetSuite |
| Founded | 2016 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, US | San Francisco, US |
| Rating | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Review volume | 20,094 | 8,004 |
Prices are the published starting rate. Ratings are averaged across G2, Capterra, and Trustpilot; we do not collect ratings ourselves.
How does Rippling compare to Remote on pricing?
Remote has transparent pricing starting at $29/mo. Rippling uses custom pricing - contact them for a quote.
💡 Tip: Prices vary based on country, employee volume, and contract terms. Request quotes from both providers to get accurate pricing for your team.
Still comparing? Get personalized pricing
Request a quote from both providers to compare costs for your specific needs.
Where can Rippling and Remote actually run payroll?
Remote supports 103 more countries than Rippling. 83 countries are covered by both. R is Rippling, R is Remote.
Only Remote (103)
How do Rippling and Remote compare on features?
Both providers offer a similar feature set.
| Feature | Rippling | Remote |
|---|---|---|
| Services offered | ||
| Global payroll | ||
| Employer of Record (EOR) | ||
| Contractor management | ||
| PEO services | ||
| Payroll features | ||
| multi-currency | ||
| automated-tax | ||
| payslip-generation | ||
| employee-portal | ||
| api-access | ||
| hris-integration | ||
| compliance-dashboard | ||
| dedicated-support | ||
| 24-7-support | ||
| mobile-app | ||
| Total features | 13 | 13 |
What are the pros and cons of Rippling vs Remote?
Both providers have similar trade-offs. Rippling has 6 pros and 5 cons, while Remote has 6 pros and 5 cons.
Pros
- The 4.8-star average across 17,648 reviews is genuinely impressive. That's a huge sample size with consistently high ratings, which tells you the product delivers at scale
- They've been around since 2016 with over 10,000 employees, so you're working with a mature company that's not going anywhere
- The all-in-one approach actually works here. You can manage payroll, benefits, devices, and software access from one dashboard instead of logging into five different tools
- 53-country coverage hits the sweet spot for most internationally growing companies without overwhelming you with options you won't use
- Payment flexibility is excellent, from standard bank transfers to SEPA, SWIFT, Wise, PayPal, and even crypto options
- 24/7 support with dedicated reps means you're not stuck waiting when payroll issues pop up outside business hours
Cons
- At $35 per employee, they're priced at the higher end of mid-range options. Deel and Remote both start at $29, Oyster ranges $29-59, so you're paying a premium
- The platform does a lot, which means there's a steeper learning curve. Reviews mention it can feel overwhelming initially compared to simpler payroll-only tools
- Only offers bi-weekly pay frequency, which could be limiting if your team needs weekly or monthly payment schedules
- 53 countries is solid but not massive. If you're hiring heavily in Asia, Africa, or Latin America, you'll want to verify they cover your specific markets
- Some reviews mention the setup process takes longer than expected, particularly when configuring the IT management components alongside payroll
Pros
- The 186-country coverage is genuinely impressive. Most competitors cap out around 100, so if you're hiring in less common markets, Remote likely has you covered.
- Over 7,000 reviews averaging 4.6 stars tells you they've processed payroll for thousands of companies. That's the kind of volume that surfaces and fixes edge cases.
- They handle everything from payroll to visa support to equipment shipping. One vendor means one invoice and one support contact instead of coordinating multiple services.
- Crypto payment option is rare in this space. If you're paying digital nomads or employees in countries with currency volatility, having that flexibility matters.
- 24/7 support with dedicated account reps. When you're running payroll across time zones, having someone available outside business hours is important.
- Their API access and HRIS integrations mean you can connect Remote to your existing HR tools rather than forcing everyone onto a new system.
Cons
- At $29 per employee, they're 4-5x more expensive than domestic providers like Gusto. If your team is US-based, you're paying for global capabilities you don't need.
- Some reviews mention slower response times during payroll deadlines when support volume spikes. If you hit an issue on payday, you might wait longer than you'd like.
- The platform tries to do everything from payroll to equipment procurement. Some users report the interface feels cluttered compared to tools that focus solely on payroll.
- Setup for new countries can take 2-3 weeks according to user feedback. If you need to hire and pay someone quickly, that timeline might not work.
- While they cover 186 countries, payment method availability varies by region. Some locations are limited to bank transfers without faster options like Wise or PayPal.
What is each one genuinely better at?
Both are solid options. The right pick depends on what matters most to your team.
Choose Rippling if
- +User reviews matter to you (rated 4.7/5 across 20,094 reviews)
- +Your priority is companies needing both payroll and it management, particularly those issuing company devices and software licenses to remote teams
- +Your priority is businesses with 50+ employees across multiple countries in europe who want to consolidate vendors
Choose Remote if
- +You prefer transparent, published pricing (from $29/mo)
- +You need broader country coverage (186 vs 83 countries)
- +Your priority is companies hiring across 10+ countries who need both payroll and employer of record capabilities under one roof
Both are solid choices for global payroll
Get started with a free demo to see which platform fits your team better. Most companies can be onboarded within days.
Frequently asked questions about Rippling vs Remote
Is Rippling or Remote cheaper?
Remote starts at $29/month per employee. Contact the providers directly for custom pricing based on your needs.
Which has more country coverage, Rippling or Remote?
Remote has broader country coverage. Rippling supports 83+ countries, while Remote supports 186+ countries.
Which is better rated, Rippling or Remote?
Rippling has a higher average rating. Rippling is rated 4.7/5 (20,094 reviews), while Remote is rated 4.5/5 (8,004 reviews).
Is Rippling or Remote better for small businesses?
This depends on your specific needs. Rippling is best for: Companies needing both payroll and IT management, particularly those issuing company devices and software licenses to remote teams, Businesses with 50+ employees across multiple countries in Europe who want to consolidate vendors. Remote is best for: Companies hiring across 10+ countries who need both payroll and employer of record capabilities under one roof, Remote-first businesses with distributed teams across multiple continents, particularly those expanding into less common markets. Consider factors like pricing, minimum employee requirements, and the countries you need coverage in.
Can I switch from Rippling to Remote (or vice versa)?
Yes, you can switch payroll providers. Most providers offer migration assistance to help transfer employee data and payroll history. The transition typically takes 30-60 days depending on complexity. Contact your target provider's sales team to discuss the migration process and timeline.
What services do Rippling and Remote offer?
Rippling offers: Employer of Record (EOR), Global payroll, Contractor management. Remote offers: Employer of Record (EOR), Global payroll, Contractor management. Both can handle global workforce management, but their specific service offerings differ.
Compare with other providers
Take it up with both directly.
Both Rippling and Remote offer free demos. Try them out to see which fits your team better.
